|
|

Daily Probe Movie Review by Alice Higgins
Professor of Wymyn's Studies University of Toronto
Adaptation
Rating: 0 stars (out of 5)
It's just so typical that a movie like Adaptation can be made, with
so much penis-waving splendour, and just because it doesn't have Adam
Sandler or Tom Green in it, my fellow movie critics fall all over it,
worshipping the film like the giant cock it is. It's enough to make
me
vomit, until I realize that they aren't so much "colleagues" as they
are pathetic souls who happen to share the same job as I, and perhaps
being exposed to that much penis has clouded their judgment over
time. I've only been reviewing film for a year. Some of these
brainwashed tool-tools have been doing it for over 20! Fear not,
sisters! I will never fall prey to the penis, you can count on that!
Adaptation answered the often-asked question: What could be worse
than a movie starring Nicolas Cage? The answer is: A movie starring 2
Nicolas Cages! If you don't believe me, ask Lisa Marie Presley.
Cage plays screenwriter Charlie Kaufman, who has been
hired to adapt the book The Orchid Thief to the screen. The only
problem is that it's almost impossible to adapt, and as a result, he
cheats and writes a screenplay about how he can't adapt the novel.
Very mature. Cage also plays Charlie's twin brother Donald. Charlie
and Donald are about as alike as DeVito and Schwarzenegger in Twins
(and Cage is about as convincing). Meanwhile, the radiant Meryl
Streep plays the author of the book, who is inexplicably drawn to
Chris Cooper, the toothless subject of her book.
It's not so much that the movie celebrates the penis (although the
pubic hair on Cage's head certainly gets the message across) but the
exploitation of the blessed vagina. Orchids feature heavily in the
film. We see them blooming, opening their lips like a womyn about to
receive the rancid seed of a man. If this isn't a subliminal message,
I don't know what is!! It's shameful that the film makers would
exploit the sainted vulva to try and keep the pea-brained attention
of the men in the audience.
The filmmakers, I am told, are the same heathens that brought us
Being John Malkovich a few years ago, which was just as bad. Not
only
was the blessed Sapphic love of two wymyn played for laughs, but at
times they needed the penile help of a man to please themselves!
Besides, if you can show me a man who looks more like a walking penis
than John Malkovich, I'd like to see him. Wait, actually I wouldn't
WANT to see him. What I meant was ... blast! I think I'm being
brainwashed too! Lilith save me!!
To close quickly, the nail in the coffin of this log of a film is the
premise. A screenwriter writing himself into a screenplay he's
writing? Things like that don't happen in real life. How do they
expect people to buy this ridiculous premise?
Once again, my sisters, you have been warned!
|
|
|